Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Front Allergy ; 3: 1009437, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36698379

RESUMO

Food allergy is a global health problem affecting up to 10% of the world population. Accurate diagnosis of food allergies, however, is still a major challenge in medical offices and for patients seeking alternative avenues of diagnosis. A flawless test to confirm or rule out a food allergy does not exist. The lack of optimum testing methods to establish precise clinical correlations remains a major obstacle to effective treatment. Certain IgE measurement methods, including component testing, have received FDA clearance, but they have been used primarily as an analytical tool and not to establish clinical correlations. Most allergy tests are still carried out within the laboratory, and skin tests outside a laboratory setting that are used for food allergy diagnosis rely on non-standardized allergens, according to the FDA definition. Epitope mapping and basophil activation test (BAT) have recently been proposed as a means of establishing better clinical correlations. Yet neither have received FDA clearance for widespread distribution. Of the two methods, the BAT has the advantage of being a functional assay. Over the past few years, several large private practice groups in the United States, have developed BAT as a clinical assay and have started using it in patient care. Given this clinical experience, the vast number of papers published on BAT (more than 1,400 as of 2022) and the trend toward increasing FDA regulation, it is essential to understand the roadmap for regulatory clearance of this assay.

2.
Immunotherapy ; 11(5): 397-406, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30626238

RESUMO

AIM: To assess Ig20Gly tolerability in pediatric patients with primary immunodeficiencies. PATIENTS & METHODS: Infusion parameters and tolerability were analyzed in pediatric patients (aged 2-5 years [n = 6], 6-11 years [n = 22] and 12-17 years [n = 22]) receiving Ig20Gly in two Phase II/III trials. RESULTS: Of 2624 Ig20Gly infusions, >99% did not require any rate reduction, interruption or discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs). Median maximum infusion rates and volumes/site were higher in patients 12-17 years of age (30 ml/h/site; 30 ml/site) versus 6-11 years (20 ml/h/site; 15 ml/site) and 2-5 years (18 ml/h/site; 14 ml/site). Rates of causally related systemic and local AEs (0.009 and 0.063 AEs/infusion) were low. CONCLUSION: Ig20Gly infused at relatively high rates and volumes was well tolerated in children.


Assuntos
Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/administração & dosagem , Doenças da Imunodeficiência Primária/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/efeitos adversos , Infusões Subcutâneas , Injeções Subcutâneas , Masculino
4.
J Clin Immunol ; 36(7): 700-12, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27582171

RESUMO

Patients with primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) typically require life-long intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) immunoglobulin (Ig) replacement therapy to prevent recurrent infections. The efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of a highly concentrated (20 %) Ig preparation for SC administration (IGSC 20 %) were evaluated in a prospective trial in patients with PIDD. A total of 74 patients (aged 3-83 years) received 4327 IGSC 20 % infusions over a median of 380.5 days. The rate of validated serious bacterial infections was 0.012 event/patient-year (p < 0.0001 compared with the historical control), and the annualized rate of infection was 2.41 events/patient. Median IgG trough levels were >14.5 g/l. The median maximum infusion rate was 60 ml/h/site (range 4.4-180), resulting in a median infusion duration of 0.95 h. A volume ≥30 ml was infused per site in 74.8 % of IGSC 20 % infusions. Most (84.9 %) infusions were administered using ≤2 infusion sites; for 99.8 % of infusions, there was no need to interrupt/stop administration or reduce the infusion rate. No related serious adverse event (AE) occurred during IGSC 20 % treatment; related non-serious AEs occurred at a rate of 0.036 event/infusion. The incidence of related local AEs was 0.015 event/infusion and of related systemic AEs was 0.021 event/infusion; most were mild in severity, none severe. Increased infusion rates or volumes were not associated with higher AE rates. The investigated IGSC 20 % treatment was shown to be effective and safe, enabling higher infusion rates and volumes per site compared to conventional SC treatments, resulting in fewer infusion sites and shorter infusion durations.


Assuntos
Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/administração & dosagem , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/farmacocinética , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infecções Bacterianas/etiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/efeitos adversos , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/complicações , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/diagnóstico , Infusões Subcutâneas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
5.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 32(2): 151-8, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21352639

RESUMO

Olopatadine hydrochloride nasal spray 0.6% (OLO) and azelastine nasal spray 137 micrograms (AZE) are effective in treating allergic rhinitis and AZE is indicated for nonallergic vasomotor rhinitis (VMR). This study evaluates the relative safety and efficacy of OLO and AZE in patients with VMR. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study compared OLO (an investigational use) with AZE over 14 days in patients (n = 129) ≥12 years of age with chronic VMR. Efficacy included the severity of nasal symptom scores. Safety included adverse events (AEs) and nasal examinations. Patient perceptions of treatment satisfaction and changes in allergy condition were determined using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication and Patient Global Assessment scores. In the OLO and AZE groups, reflective scores for individual nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, postnasal drip, and sneezing) and total nasal VMR symptom scores decreased significantly from baseline to day 14 (p < 0.05). No significant between-group differences were observed (p > 0.05). No serious AEs were reported in either group. Overall, 22 and 20 AEs were reported in the OLO and AZE groups, respectively. The most common AE was taste disturbance, reported by three (5.3%) and six (10.3%) patients in the OLO and AZE groups, respectively. Patients in both groups reported similar treatment satisfaction scores and a majority of patients in both groups perceived an overall improvement in their rhinitis condition. OLO has a similar efficacy and safety profile to AZE for the management of VMR in patients ≥12 years of age.


Assuntos
Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Dibenzoxepinas/uso terapêutico , Ftalazinas/uso terapêutico , Rinite Vasomotora/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Intranasal , Adulto , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mucosa Nasal/efeitos dos fármacos , Sprays Nasais , Cloridrato de Olopatadina , Paladar , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...